• Blog
  • From Chatbot to Code Threat: OWASP’s Agentic AI Top 10 and the Specialized Risks of Coding Agents

Blog

From Chatbot to Code Threat: OWASP’s Agentic AI Top 10 and the Specialized Risks of Coding Agents

Book a Demo

 

The rise of autonomous AI Agents - systems that plan, delegate, and execute complex workflows - has fundamentally reshaped the application security landscape. Just yesterday, the OWASP GenAI Security Project released its critical Top 10 for Agentic Applications, a focused list of the most severe security risks facing these self-governing systems.  

This list covers a spectrum of threats, from attackers exploiting an agent's logic to change its core mission (Agent Goal Hijack) to abusing its external capabilities (Tool Misuse & Exploitation) and even exploiting the connections between agents (Insecure Inter-Agent Communication).  

It's a clear signal: the age of autonomous AI is here, and it brings a unique, high-stakes attack surface. 

 

Beyond the Agentic Scope: The Extreme Threat Posed by AI Coding Agents 

Crucially, the OWASP Top 10 risks apply to all AI agent types. A Rogue Agent (OWASP #10) could be an infrastructure agent stuck in an endless resource-draining loop or a financial agent autonomously executing unauthorized trades. 

However, the risk profile escalates dramatically when we look at AI Coding Agents. When a coding agent is compromised or simply generates vulnerable code, it touches the actual core code of the company - the repository of customer data and the source of competitive advantage. The resulting vulnerabilities are immediately merged into the software development lifecycle (SDLC) at speed, posing a colossal risk to the organization's security posture. 

 

Legit Research: Specialized Risks to the Codebase 

Legit Security research into the risks posed specifically by AI Coding Agents reveals a critical new class of vulnerabilities that directly impact the integrity of your codebase and development pipeline. This research expands the threat model by identifying unique vectors not captured in the general OWASP list, while also detailing risks that amplify existing threats. 

 

Key Attack Vectors identified by Legit 

  • Generating Vulnerable Code: Coding agents frequently choose insecure patterns or flawed libraries, resulting in high rates of vulnerable code generation. 
  • Sensitive Data Exposed by MCP Extension: MCP introduces a unique, high-risk data-exfiltration channel where agents can share source code, secrets, and user files with external tools or other agents. 
  • Code Exposed to 3rd Parties by the Agent: Agents may leak proprietary source code to unauthorized external tools or services, creating direct IP and security exposure. 
  • Hallucinated Library Injection (Slopsquatting): Agents often invent nonexistent library names that attackers register as malicious packages, enabling stealth compromise unique to coding-agent workflows. 
  • Agent Trains on Proprietary Code and Secrets: Agents that learn from sensitive internal code may later leak secrets or reproduce insecure patterns. 

 

Risks Amplifying OWASP Threats 

  • Bypass of CI/CD Security Controls: When agents gain elevated or implicit access, they can circumvent CI/CD checks (Relates to OWASP’s Identity & Privilege Abuse risk). 
  • Supply Chain Attack by Agent Prompt Injections: Prompt-injection attacks can hijack agent goals and force harmful outputs (Relates to OWASP risks like Agent Goal Hijack and Tool Misuse). 
  • Agent Instruction File Poisoning: Tampering with an agent’s instruction files compromises its behavioral supply chain (Relates to OWASP’s Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities). 
  • GenAI Code Untested by Security Controls: Allowing unvalidated agent-generated code into production creates cascading weaknesses (Relates to OWASP’s Cascading Failures risk). 

As autonomous agents move from experimentation into real engineering workflows, their potential to introduce code-level vulnerabilities grows exponentially. The combined insights from OWASP and Legit’s research make one thing clear: securing AI Coding Agents isn’t optional - it’s now a foundational requirement for protecting your software supply chain. 

 

Introducing VibeGuard: Secure Your AI Code Pipeline 

The sheer volume and severity of these risks, especially those tied to the core codebase, require a dedicated defense layer. 

VibeGuard by Legit is an IDE plugin designed to secure AI Coding assistants and agents and enforce AppSec directly at the coding stage. VibeGuard operates as a "firewall" between the user and the AI Agent, blocking attacks, enforcing policy and security posture directly where the code is written. 

VibeGuard addresses several high-impact use cases: It strengthens code security at the IDE by delivering safe instructions to agents and scanning generated code, and it detects and blocks security incidents in real time. This includes preventing MCP-related risks, stopping prompt-injection attacks, and identifying hidden prompts-ensuring dangerous or insecure actions are halted before they compromise your codebase. In addition, VibeGuard provides full discovery, security, and governance for all AI coding agents, including monitoring usage, managing technology-approval workflows, and enforcing policies directly within the IDE. 

Are you ready to discover the unmanaged AI agents in your environment and start enforcing your security policies? 

 

Get a stronger AppSec foundation you can trust and prove it’s doing the job right.

Request a Demo
See the Legit AI-Native ASPM Platform in Action

Find out how we are helping enterprises like yours secure AI-generated code.

Demo_ASPM
Need guidance on AppSec for AI-generated code?

Download our new whitepaper.

Legit-AI-WP-SOCIAL-v3-1