4 New AppSec Requirements in the Age of AI
Get details on 4 new AppSec requirements in the AI-led software development era.

Get details on 4 new AppSec requirements in the AI-led software development era.
We all know AI is transforming software development, and software security. But in the midst of all the hype, fear, and information overload, what are the top 4 AppSec steps you should focus on today?
Our experts recommend the following:
AI discovery
AI visibility is now a key part of AppSec. The ability to identify AI-generated code, and where and how AI is in use in your software development environment has become critical.
You want to both discover AI in your environment, and create governance around how it’s used.
What exactly do you need to discover? Ultimately, all AI elements in your development environment – every model your developers are creating, every MCP they are using, and other components like AI services.
In addition, what AI-generating tools are in use? Cursor? Copilot? You’ll need to apply governance around these tools as well.

AI-specific security testing
AI-specific security testing has become vital as well. AI brings in some novel vulnerabilities and weaknesses that traditional scanners can’t find, such as training model poisoning, excessive agency, or others detailed in OWASP’s LLM & Gen AI Top 10.
You also now need the ability to identify low-reputation or malicious AI models in use.
Threat modeling
As the risk to the organization is changing, so too must threat models. If your app now exposes AI interfaces, is running an agent, or gets input from users and uses the model to process it, you’ve got new risks.
Legit’s Advanced Code Change Management plays a role here. It can detect when a team is introducing a new AI component to their app, then alert the right people to threat model the app before it’s too late. You don’t want to discover a chatbot without the proper guardrails after it’s been deployed for months.
Awareness of toxic combinations
The use of AI in code development itself is not necessarily a risk. But when its use is combined with another risk, like lack of static analysis or branch protection, the risk level rises.
For instance, research for our 2025 State of Application Risk report revealed that, on average, 17% of repos per organization have developers using GenAI tools PLUS lack of branch protection or code review.

These “toxic combinations” require both discovering which development pipelines are using GenAI to create code, and then ensuring those pipelines have all the appropriate security measures and guardrails in place.
Learn more
Get more details on AppSec in the Age of AI in our new whitepaper.
Legit Security needs the contact information you provide to us to contact you about our products and services. You may unsubscribe from these communications at any time. For information on how to unsubscribe, as well as our privacy practices and commitment to protecting your privacy, check out our Privacy Policy.
More insights for modern AppSec teams

Stop Drowning in the 30%
A product security engineer described their AppSec pipeline as roughly 70% automated and 30% still manual. That manual slice is where teams get stuck, and where context-aware prioritization belongs.

Agentic Remediation Just Got Bigger: Now Fixing Vulnerabilities in Your Dependencies, Not Just Your Code
Legit Security's Agentic Remediation now tackles vulnerabilities in dependencies, ensuring faster, verified fixes and enhancing AppSec in an AI-driven landscape.



See it in your stack
Every prompt, every commit, every deploy, covered the moment you're ready.

